Scope and methods
The static public-source inventory examined 30 files and identified 1,362 longer prose strings in 17 files. Selected English, Spanish and French wording was checked with 15 web-search expressions in five groups. Seven returned external pages were fetched and checked for selected exact phrases using case/spacing normalization; no selected exact phrase matched those seven pages. This was not a web comparison of every inventoried passage.
The image inventory contained 269 records, including unused assets, 60 excluded vendor promotional files and ISO material excluded from substantive review. Exact SHA-256 and 64-bit local difference-hash comparisons were performed against 603 readable uploaded images. There was one exact uploaded-image match and five close visual candidates; these counts overlap and visual hashes can produce false positives. One ICO file was not decoded by the image library.
Nine uploaded research/template/internal DOCX files and two public downloadable CV-template DOCX files were reviewed through text and embedded-media structure. Uploads, metadata, “prepared for” labels and references to licenses are provenance clues, not signed copyright assignments. Personal CV PDFs and data spreadsheets were not cleared or sent to public search. Connected mailboxes, remote private repositories and production customer uploads were not searched.
Corrective actions and publication safeguards
Sixty unverified vendor promotional images were excluded from production bundles and replaced in their public placements with original contextual SVG illustrations. The previous OSINT promotional montage containing non-partner vendor wordmarks was also removed. The homepage and OSINT report now use replacement poster artwork supplied and selected by the site owner, who describes it as not containing official company logos; that description is not an independent rights clearance. Promotional artwork and contextual illustrations are not evidence of a vendor incident or a live product screen. The removed files are not redistributed in the current build; this does not adjudicate past use.
Weekly reporting was changed to source references and original summaries rather than copied headlines, descriptions and promotional images; legacy editions were sanitized at the API boundary. The unrelated ECorp copyright credit was replaced. These corrections do not retroactively grant rights or establish that all remaining material is cleared.
Complete notices are collected for software actually bundled in the browser, including transitive packages and vendored sublicenses. Authoritative supplements are retained when npm distributions omit required license text. A missing bundled notice fails the build rather than being silently omitted. License chips and counts are convenience labels, not substitutes for the full terms.
Artwork, photographs, logos and templates
Current report and Recon illustrations still require their original creation/generation records and applicable commercial-use terms, or a creator’s assignment/license. An “AI-generated” label is not ownership evidence. Genuine external reverse-image clearance was not completed: keyword image searches and local similarity checks are not image-based web-index searches.
JawaSec and WORTEV were identified as business partners by the site owner. That instruction supports the partner display, not an inference of accreditation, certification, wider endorsement or a signed trademark license. Relevant partner brand-use guidance or written authorization should be retained where available.
At the owner’s request, non-partner training-provider logos were removed from the current site and their 13 standalone image files were removed from the public assets: AWS, CertiProf, CompTIA, EC-Council, Hack The Box, INE, ISACA, ISC2, OffSec, PECB, PeopleCert, PortSwigger and TryHackMe. Certification and course names remain as text; logo removal is not a finding that their past use was unlawful. Company branding, the JawaSec and WORTEV partner logos, and the expressly excluded ISO material were retained. Any future reintroduction of provider logos requires the applicable brand-use terms or permission. This reduces the specific logo-reproduction risk, not every copyright or trademark risk.
The public English/Spanish CV templates were examined, but their creator’s redistribution or assignment terms were not supplied. Company-authored material needs its authorship record; commissioned material needs appropriate rights from its creator. Generic functional headings are not automatically protected expression or proof of copying.
No current source references were found for three generic legacy images showing a city skyline, a keyboard and a blue abstract background. Their presence as unused files was not treated as an active publication infringement. Before reuse, retain a stock license, creator permission or original generation record. Text-based stock-image searches returned candidates, not verified copies.
Assessment resources, fonts and licensing boundaries
The official IPIP permission page explicitly places its items, scales and inventories in the public domain for commercial and non-commercial purposes. This verifies permission for the underlying IPIP materials, not psychometric validity, local norms, translation equivalence or suitability for hiring decisions. Source/version information and implementation limits remain relevant.
The inspected work-values implementation describes original prompts based on O*NET concepts. This is not proof of a copied proprietary test. Actual reproduction or adaptation of O*NET database content requires the correct version, attribution, license link and change notices under the applicable terms. Its database license does not automatically cover career-exploration tools or other website content; those have separate terms.
Google Fonts permits commercial use subject to each font’s license. “Free” availability does not remove redistribution or notice duties. The applicable font files and license terms, rather than a general service description, govern a particular use.
Legal meaning: what is and is not established
Copyright protection, permitted use and infringement depend on the work, ownership, applicable jurisdiction, actual use and any license or exception. The Mexican Federal Copyright Law and U.S. Copyright Office guidance are references, not a finding that either jurisdiction controls every use. Quotation and other exceptions are conditional; there is no universally safe fixed quotation length or percentage.
Public availability, attribution, a source hyperlink, a business relationship, a purchased copy or an uploaded file do not by themselves establish permission to reproduce or redistribute a protected work. Ideas, facts, common functional language and protected creative expression must not be treated as the same thing. Trademark and endorsement questions can remain separate from copyright.
This disclosure records supported findings and unresolved questions, not a warranty, indemnity, court judgment, independent counsel’s opinion, or a blanket assertion that Lyon & Fiurex LLC Group does or does not violate intellectual-property law. Publishing this notice does not cure an unauthorized use, waive third-party rights, or replace compliance with an applicable license.
Outstanding evidence and review exclusions
No signed asset-specific grants were supplied for verification during this review. Remaining evidence concerns stock-photo purchase/license terms for reused stock imagery, creator redistribution/assignment terms or original generation records for commissioned templates and illustrations, and applicable partner brand-use guidance. Non-partner provider logos are no longer displayed or distributed as standalone public assets; their permission review would be needed before reintroduction, rather than for a continuing display. Material genuinely created and owned by the company does not require another party’s permission solely because it is used here.
Unindexed websites, paywalled/private corpora and a comprehensive external plagiarism database were not covered. External image-based matching and signed-permission verification remain incomplete. No personal records or private contracts are published in this disclosure.
ISO material was expressly excluded from this copyright review and its presentation was left unchanged. That exclusion is not an assessment or validation of ISO-related rights or claims. Other contractual, privacy and service terms remain on the site’s dedicated legal pages; this page focuses on copyright, provenance, attribution and software licensing.
